FreeRTOS Support Archive
The FreeRTOS support forum is used to obtain active support directly from Real
Time Engineers Ltd. In return for using our top quality software and services for
free, we request you play fair and do your bit to help others too! Sign up
to receive notifications of new support topics then help where you can.
This is a read only archive of threads posted to the FreeRTOS support forum.
The archive is updated every week, so will not always contain the very latest posts.
Use these archive pages to search previous posts. Use the Live FreeRTOS Forum
link to reply to a post, or start a new support thread.
[FreeRTOS Home] [Live FreeRTOS Forum] [FAQ] [Archive Top] [February 2012 Threads] MPLAB C32 compiler optimisationPosted by ulmus on February 21, 2012 Do you know about something i have to remember when compiler optimisation is used? I have a working big project with lots peripheria and tasks, now i turned on optimisation and.... my app is not working as it should :(
RE: MPLAB C32 compiler optimisationPosted by MEdwards on February 21, 2012 Not an easy question to answer, but the kernel should not have a problem with optimization.
Normally either the compiler optimizer has bugs, running the code faster shows up weeknesses in your code (time dependencies), you are relying on code that the compiler rightly thinks is not doing anything and removes (using a null loop for a delay for example), but most commonly you are missing volatile qualifiers on a variable.
RE: MPLAB C32 compiler optimisationPosted by ulmus on February 21, 2012 Yeah, i think so, that i am missing somewhere 'volatile' qualifier. I just have asked if there is something more i have to know and remember. Thanx for help. I must now dig deep in my project to find that buggy variable :(
Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
|