FreeRTOS Support Archive
The FreeRTOS support forum is used to obtain active support directly from Real
Time Engineers Ltd. In return for using our top quality software and services for
free, we request you play fair and do your bit to help others too! Sign up
to receive notifications of new support topics then help where you can.
This is a read only archive of threads posted to the FreeRTOS support forum.
The archive is updated every week, so will not always contain the very latest posts.
Use these archive pages to search previous posts. Use the Live FreeRTOS Forum
link to reply to a post, or start a new support thread.
[FreeRTOS Home] [Live FreeRTOS Forum] [FAQ] [Archive Top] [October 2008 Threads] receiving efficiently messages from queuesPosted by bodev on October 27, 2008 Hi all, in many FreeRTOS examples, i have seen code like this:
while( xQueueReceive( queue, &mess, portMAX_DELAY ) != pdPASS );
i was wondering if this is efficient in the sense that it blocks the thread until a message is posted or this instruction implies a true active polling and hence consumes CPU time.
is there any efficient way to do this?
the obvious solution that come to mind is to use a binarysemaphore to signal that a message has been posted, so the receiving thread can stop on the sempahore and only when woken up receive the message.
comments? any other solution?
Regards, BoDev
RE: receiving efficiently messages from queuesPosted by Richard on October 27, 2008 > while( xQueueReceive( queue, &mess, portMAX_DELAY ) != pdPASS );
This code is truely blocking - not polling.
xQueueReceive() is in a while loop to deal with the case where the block time expires, but no data has been received.
Taking the two extremes:
Depending on your configuration (see the configuration section of the WEB docs), portMAX_DELAY may block indefinitely, in which case xQueueReceive() will only return when it has successfully received some data. In this case the while() loop has no effect as xQueueReceive() will only ever return pdPASS.
If you have not configured your system to allow indefinite blocking, and you are using 16bit ticks, then portMAX_DELAY will expire every 0xffff ticks, so it xQueueReceive() could well return pdFALSE, depending on how often data is written to the queue. [most systems would use 32bit ticks].
Regards.
Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
|